Magazine content за Апрель 2022 г.
Magazine Cover
Press to zoom

Buy a PDF

ARCHIVE FOR 2022    RUSSIAN

mag->month > 0 ) { ?>

mag->getMonthString();?> mag->year;?>

mag->pdf_file): ?> sess && $this->sess->isArticlePayed()):?>

Апрель 2022

CONTENT

 

Chief editor’s column

 

 

Interview of the issue

 

The Event. Comments of the Experts

Council Of Europe without Russia: Consequences and Prospects
Comments By A. Kovler, M. Agaltsova, M. Galperin, A. Evseev
Buy a PDF

 

Topic of the issue

G.A. Esakov On Concept of Unified Official Crimes
The author analyses the system of crimes committed by public and private official persons codified in the Criminal Code of 1996. The hypothesis of the article is based on an idea that the strict delimitation between crimes committed, on the one hand, by public official persons and, on the other, by private ones is now eroded. Todaу, the notion of “public official persons” includes managers of state-controlled corporate bodies, even in cases of non-direct control. The list of crimes for official persons in private sphere copies the same list for public officials. The level of punishments in case law is equal for both categories of managers. Therefore, the author proposes to recodify official crimes as unified chapter in the Criminal Code. This approach will allow to simplify the criminal legislation and to preserve the idea of equality before the law.
Keywords: official person, official crime, bribery, misuse of authority, punishment
Buy a PDF

 

A.G. Bezverkhov, S.V. Elekina Strategy for the Development of Russian Criminal Legislation on Official Crimes in the XXI Century
The article outlines the main contours of a new strategy for the development of Russian criminal legislation on crimes against the interests of the State service. It is indicated that one of the stable legislative trends in the development of the norms on such crimes in the first quarter of the 21st century is associated with an increase in the number of their elements of crimes provided for by chapters 23 and 30 of the Criminal Code. A number of novelties have been predicted, including the possible introduction of a new composition in Chapter 23 “Forgery of documents by a person performing managerial functions in a commercial or other organization”. It is shown that modern criminal legislation is moving towards increasing the number of grounds for criminal liability for corruption offences and ensuring a strict differentiation of liability for these offences. With regard to the concept of an official, а continuing broad interpretation of this concept has been detected. It is emphasized that on a historical scalе the crimes in question are a kind of “pulsar”. In the transition of a society from one type of management to another, such crime is either pulled together into one “knot”, simplifying its structure to the maximum (official crime in a society with an administrative-command control system), or it unfolds in all the variety of types and forms, affecting many kinds of organizational-managerial relations (office crime in a society with market relations). Limiting its manifestation to the area of public law relations, such crime takes the form of official crime, where officials are the only special subjects of the relevant violations, and corruption is reduced to its core — bribery. In the conditions of an entrepreneurial economy, there are qualitative changes in the content of the compositions of the violations under study, expressed primarily in an increase in the number of main objects and in a variety of special subjects, which indicates the process of transforming the institution of “malfeasance” into a complex institution of official (including corruption) offenses.
Keywords: malfeasance, service offenses, corruption crimes, crimes against the interests of the service
Buy a PDF

 

V.N. Borkov New Definition of Official: Problems of Interpretation
The article examines the changes made to paragraph 1 of the note to Art. 285 of the Criminal Code, which expanded the circle of persons acting as possible subjects of malfeasance at the expense of employees of commercial organizations designed to act in the interests of the State. Such an approach, on the one hand, creates the prerequisites for differentiating the responsibility of persons vested with administrative powers, depending on the legal status of the organization and the social expectations associated with its activities. On the other hand, it gives rise to qualification problems due to the complexity of the normative regulation of corporate governance in business entities. The author gives reasoned solutions to a number of special problems of establishing signs of the subject of malfeasance. In particular, a person who has committed an administrative crime in the exercise of his powers in the organization specified in paragraph 1 of the note to Art. 285, but who was not aware of this circumstance, is proposed to be recognized as an official, guided by the qualification rule in case of a legal error.
Keywords: malfeasance, official, person performing managerial functions in a commercial organization, state participation in the management of business entities, factual error, legal error
Buy a PDF

 

T.B. Basova Specially Qualified Kinds of Excessing Official Powers in the Light of Judicial Practice
Based on the study of the law enforcement situation, the article deals with the complex problems of the criminal law assessment of especially qualified types of abuse of official powers, provided for in paragraphs “a” and paragraph “c” of Part 3 of Art. 286 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. An answer is given to a question that has an ambiguous interpretation in practice: in what cases violent acts in excess of official powers are covered by a simple offence of abuse of official powers (part 1 of Article 286 of the Criminal Code), and when should they be regarded as violent abuse of official powers (para “a” part 3 of the same article). Based on the analysis of the positions of the highest court, the author supports the conclusion that the infliction of any harm to the health of the victim, including serious one, as a result of violence used in excess of official powers, is fully covered by paragraph “a” part 3 of Art. 286. A critical assessment is given to the practice of qualifying the action, by which as a result of physical violence used by an official, serious harm to health was caused not only under paragraph “a” of Part 3 of Article 286, but also additionally impute liability for causing grave consequences (paragraph “c” part 3 of Article 286). The author believes that the official clarifications of the Plenum of the Supreme Court may become of great importance in solving these problems. This will give certainty to certain provisions of the legal norms presented in Article 286 of the Criminal Code, which are ambiguous, evaluative in nature, having unclear meaning. This accordingly, will allow overcoming law enforcement difficulties and defects in judicial practice.
Keywords: abuse of power, use of violence, threat of violence, grave consequences, ideal set of crimes
Buy a PDF

 

P.S. Yani A Teacher in the Intersessional Period Is not a Subject of Receiving a Bribe
The article substantiates the conclusion that it is impossible to regard as bribery the remuneration by a student to a teacher who, during the intersessional period, turns to another teacher with a request to give an undeservedly high mark to the student at the upcoming session.
Keywords: official, teacher, taking a bribe, fraud, abuse of influence
Buy a PDF

 

V.F. Shchepelkov Features of the Qualification of Official Crimes in the Field of Preventive Medicine
The article provides data on official offences in the field of preventive medicine in the Russian Federation, highlights typical official crimes in this area. The legal analysis of the results of monitoring the application of articles of the Criminal Code on responsibility for crimes, which qualify official offences of representatives of the medical community, allowed during preventive medical examinations, medical examinations (Articles 290, 291.2, 292, 327 of the Criminal Code), is given. Conclusions on the qualification of these crimes are formulated. Criminal and legal assessments of the production and use of forged medical documents for various preventive medical measures are shown, criteria for the public danger of these crimes are highlighted. The typical legal situations associated with the need to distinguish a single continued receipt of a bribe from a set of crimes are analyzed.
Keywords: qualification of crimes, official crimes, official forgery, taking a bribe, preventive medicine
Buy a PDF

 

V.N. Shikhanov Are Doctors and Teachers Be Criminally Liable as Officials: Nuances of Law Enforcement
The article analyzes the legal construction of the “official” in the situation of its application to doctors, as well as teachers. In modern criminal law doctrine, as well as law enforcement practice, there has not been a verified monotonous approach to the issue of the possibility of bringing medical and pedagogical workers to criminal responsibility for official crimes. Considering the arguments put forward for and against such decisions, the author comes to the conclusion that doctors and teachers should be attributed to a special subspecies of officials, calling them “certifiers of legal facts” or “factofixers”. In the domestic legal system, taking into account the position of the Constitutional Court and the Plenum of the Supreme Court, this function is recognized as a subspecies of organizational and administrative powers. It is noted that the incorrect decision on the presence or absence of signs of an official is often the reason for the incorrect application of this legal construction. In order to improve law enforcement practice, such errors are analyzed in the article, supported by individual court decisions.
Keywords: official, government representative, teacher, medical staff, criminal liability, special subject of crime
Buy a PDF

 

D.A. Garbatovich Problems of Corruption Prevention in Russia: Implementation and Compliance with International Anti-Corruption Standards
The article identifies the problems of preventing corruption in Russia: 1) there are actual bribery of officials who are not corrupt; 2) criminal repression does not apply to all participants in corruption; 3) criminal-legal means in the prevention of corruption are characterized by low efficiency; 4) there is no strict control over the compliance of expenses, property obligations of a person with his legal income; 5) the desire of the state to prevent corruption is not obvious to society. These problems exist due to the fact that the state either does not have the ability to introduce, or is not fully able to comply with international anti-corruption standards: 1) to recognice any undue advantage as the subject of bribery; 2) establish criminal liability of legal entities for committing bribery; 3) use the institution of confiscation of property; 4) prevent the legalication (laundering) of criminal property; 5) conclude government contracts based on the principles of transparency and competition; 6) establish control over the compliance of expenses, property obligations of officials with their income; 7) regulate criminal liability for unjust enrichment; 8) establish a requirement that a person be obliged to prove the legality of the origin of property obtained as a result of a crime and subject to confiscation; 9) instil in the society an intolerant attitude towards corrupt behaviour.
Keywords: prevention of corruption, international anti-corruption standards
Buy a PDF

 

Discussion Board

V.A. Alexeev What’s New in Immovable Property Law: A Critical Commentary
For the first time, the article proposes a critical legal analysis of new norms of the Civil Code, which enter into force on 1 March, 2022, by virtue of Federal Law No. 430‑FZ of 21 December, 2021 “On Amendments to Part One of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation”. It is noted that the law is the first normative act entirely devoted to the implementation of the real law reform in relation to the definition of the types of immovable things and certain issues of their legal regime. An opinion is expressed about the reasons that did not allow the inclusion in the Civil Code of norms aimed at implementing the model of a single real estate object and the idea of forming a new system of property rights. The author seeks to reveal the real meaning of new legal norms and reflects on possible (including negative) consequences of their application, critically examines the wording of the law, proposing their interpretation and possible changes in order to increase the efficiency of legal regulation in the real estate sphere.
Keywords: real estate, property law reform, land plot, building, structure, premises, common property of the building
Buy a PDF

 

S.Yu. Chucha On the Issue of “New Social Law” and the Subject of Civil Law
Using the example of civil and labor, the article attempts to understand the structure of law, the reasons for dividing it into branches, the reasons for the change in traditional subjects and the emergence of new branches in the context of a change in technological structures. The theory of labor relations is investigated. Assumptions are formulated about the future transformation of private and public law in the context of a change in the economic paradigm of society. The strengthening of the role of existing and the emergence of new social branches of law is substantiated. The author tries to argue polemically about the problems raised in the article by A. A. Ivanov's “Expansion of the subject of civil law: the social aspect”, recently published by “Zakon”, invites and even provokes interested readers to dialogue.
Keywords: civil law, labor law, social law, branch of law, labor relationship, digitalization, doctrine, paradigm, digital ruble
Buy a PDF

 

 

Press Release

 

Theory and practice

R.V. Makin, A.А. Markelova Reservation of Lands: Some Problems of Legal Regulation and Court Practice
This article analyzes legal institution of reservation of lands for public needs, which is scarcely explored in the Russian legal doctrine. Purposes and main features of the legal institution of reservation of lands are discussed as well as a number of problems in connection with the application of the rules of this legal institution in practice, such as restrictions upon authority of the owner of a reserved land plot, a problem of manifestation of restrictions in connection with reservation, remedies of the owner of a reserved land plot etc.
Keywords: restrictions on the right of ownership, reservation of lands for public needs, principle of inviolability of property rights, expropriation
Buy a PDF

 

K.V. Geets Binding Legal Relationship of the Administrator and Registrar of Domain Names: Occurrence, Modification and Termination
The domain name system is managed by private organizations. In the absence of civil law regulation of domain names in Russia, the drafting of contracts for them involves strict compliance with the rules of registration in the relevant domain zone, which has a regulatory nature for both parties of the legal relationship. Being a contract of accession and at the same time a public contract, the contract for the provision of services between the registrar and the administrator assumes different legal regulation of the possibility of its unilateral change or termination, depending on the subject composition of the parties and their conduct of business under a domain name, which does not happen in practice. In addition, the automated processes of concluding, changing and terminating contracts do not imply a change in one party by registering succession — instead, the legal relationship is terminated and begins anew with a new party. The features of the domain names themselves as unique digital objects, in addition, suggest a limited use of cases of termination of the registrar»s obligations — so, innovation and offset do not apply to them. Since the legal relationship in question arises from a service contract, partial termination of obligations also seems impossible. The specifics of the object also does not imply the termination of obligations due to the impossibility of their fulfilment, and the rules for the registration of domain zones do not provide for the possibility of termination of obligations by compensation.
Keywords: domain names, termination of obligations, accession agreement, public agreement, amendment of the agreement, termination of the agreement
Buy a PDF

 

O.A. Zharkova Creation of a New Real Estate: Public and Civil Legislation
The article analyzes various types of urban planning activities that can lead to the creation of a new capital structure and a new real estate asset from the standpoint of public and civil law. According to the author, not every new capital structure becomes a new real estate asset. Here, the crucial role is played by the registration legislation, which finalizes the process of a new real estate asset creation by transforming a new capital structure into a new real estate asset. However, sometimes there is a lack of continuity of urban planning legislation and registration legislation in the regulation of the process of a new real estate asset creation, and with the introduction of Chapter 6.1 Immovables into the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, new questions arose, which the author is trying to answer.
Keywords: reconstruction, structural repairs, capital structure relocation, internal alterations of premises, property division, real estate asset creation, works on the adaptation of a cultural heritage site
Buy a PDF

 

E.F. Evseev Appealing Default Judgement
The legal doctrine of default judgement is probably the most favorite target of criticism in theory of civil procedure. Not only some rules of civil law that form it are assessed negatively — the very rationale for its necessity, at least, as it exists today, is questioned. The main reason for this is the lack of detail and accuracy of wording of the rules contained in Chapter 22 “Judgement in Default” of the Code of Civil Procedure, especially those that are devoted to an appealing against default judgement, which naturally causes the lack of uniformity in their interpretation and application. There is also a gap in law, which is only partially corrected by the emerging judicial practice. However, there is a tendency to cancel absentee decisions to the obvious detriment and violation of the rights of plaintiffs and other persons involved in the case that even more requires comprehension and correction. All this explains the continuing relevance of research of the procedure for appealing against default judgements.
Keywords: judgement in default, default judgement, appeal of the default judgement, court ruling, procedural time limits, restoration of procedural time limits, procedural complicity
Buy a PDF