ARCHIVE FOR 2019 RUSSIAN
// if($this->mag->month > 0 ) { ?>
//=$this->mag->getMonthString();?> //=$this->mag->year;?>
//}?>
// if (!!$this->mag->pdf_file): ?>
// if ($this->sess && $this->sess->isArticlePayed()):?>
//endif?>
//endif;?>
Март 2019
CONTENT
Chief editor’s column
Interview of the issue
The Event. Comments of the Experts
Topic of the issue
V.A. Belov What Is Foreseeability? In the past couple of years, Russian literature has been increasingly
focused on whether to stipulate it in the Civil Code
that damages can be recovered only for foreseeable losses.
The author points to continued uncertainty surrounding
the matter despite the scope and intensity of discussions.
Going back and forth between objective and subjective
sides of perception, in the heat of debate they tend to overlook
the principle of moderation in essence multiplication.
At the end of the day, the notion of foreseeability comes down
to one of the old-standing and well-known categories in civil
law: foreseeability is another type of reference for causation
on the objective side and for culpability on the subjective
side. The author’s final conclusion is that there is no need to
amend because foreseeability has long been provided for in
the Russian Civil Code. It is just a matter of correctly interpreting
statutory provisions and thoroughly understanding their
meaning.
Keywords:
injury, damages, direct damages, consequential damages, foreseeability of damages, causation, culpability
Buy a PDF
A.A. Yagelnitsky Trends in Damages Cases The author describes recent trends in adjudication of claims
for damages in 2017 and 2018. His analysis shows that
the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation has admitted
— with some reservation though — the recovery of pure
economic loss and underlined the importance of expressly
stating reasons for awards or dismissal when ordering the recovery
of damages.
Keywords:
pure economic loss, solidarity, subsidiarity, causation
Buy a PDF
A.V. Tomsinov Damages for Breach of Supply Contracts This article outlines current approaches to recovering damages
for contractual breach in Russia. It analyses the reasons
that are being given by courts and provides examples that
illustrate how theoretical principles can be used to validate
the recovery of damages by the buyer in the value of
liquidated damages received by third parties. The conclusion
is reached that these cases need to be considered applying
a set of principles such as foreseeability, causality and
reasonableness of the creditor’s actions to reduce damage
in addition to the well-established practice of evaluating
whether the debtor is in a position to foresee the possibility
of a loss.
Keywords:
damages, supply contract, foreseeability, causation, liquidated damages
Buy a PDF
V.S. Mikhailov On Admissibility of Reimbursement of Expenses Incurred Regardless of the Damaging Event The work pertains to the problem of reimbursement of expenses
that would have been incurred by the aggrieved person
regardless of the damaging event. In particular, the article
analyses the possibility of reimbursement of expenses
incurred by the aggrieved person in the event of causing harm
with purpose of minimising the amount of possible damages
(preventive expenses) and the possibility of reimbursement
of expenses associated with enjoyment of certain property
(rent, insurance premiums, taxes etc.) which the aggrieved
person continues to bear after impairment of such property
without any possibility of using it (frustrated expenses).
Keywords:
causation, conditio sine qua non test, preventive expenses, frustrated expenses
Buy a PDF
A.A. Markelova Certain Aspects of Establishing Causation in Cases on State Liability in Tort This article discusses some of the issues in establishing
a causal relationship in cases on state liability. Courts sometimes
refuse to compensate for damage caused by a public
entity referring to the fact that the damage resulted not from
officials’ wrongful acts but from other circumstances, such
as the victim’s (contributory) negligence or actions by third
parties. The analysis of the theory, case law and foreign practices
with regard to the negligence of the victim and the plurality
of causes allows victims to be prepared for possible
barriers to substantiate causation in state liability cases, to
take all possible measures, as well as to formulate a legal
opinion to make their claims satisfied.
Keywords:
causation, public torts, conditio sine qua non, adequate causation, state liability, compensation of damage, contributory negligence
Buy a PDF
Judicial practice. Comments
E.B. Diyachenko, K.V. Entin An Overview of the Eurasian Economic Union Court’s Case-Law in 2017–2018 The article contains an analysis of the main legal findings
of the EAEU Court in 2017–2018. The case-law of the EAEU
Court is examined from several angles: its influence on
the application of EAEU law in the Union and the Member-
States and from a comparative perspective taking EU law and
the case-law of the CJEU as a point of reference. The Court’s
judgments and advisory opinions addressed various issues
pertaining to competition law, customs regulation, free
movement of goods and workers, labour relations with
the EAEU bodies’ employees and officials. Most notably,
the Court has formulated the essential characteristics of
EAEU law and provided a definition for the types of policies
implemented by the Union. The establishment by the Court
of the characteristics of EAEU law — such as primacy, direct
effect and direct applicability — constitutes, according
to the authors, a necessary precondition for its effective
development and application, and paves the way for its use
to protect the individuals’ rights and legitimate interests in
the national legal systems.
Keywords:
Eurasian integration, EAEU Court, properties of EAEU law, competition law, functioning of internal market, free movement of goods, free movement of workers
Buy a PDF
Press Release
Theory and practice
A.E. Kirpichev Conflict of Special Rules in the Law of Obligations The complexity of the contract law implies conflicts of rules.
Ancient principles ‘lex posterior derogat priori’ and ‘lex specialis
derogat generali’ cannot solve all possible conflicts in modern
multi-level and complex contract law. The complex system of
contract law in Russia provides several levels of special rules,
including not only Civil Code’s norms of the general part and
on a specific contractual type, but also rules of complementary
legislation and some norms of ‘public contract law’ (according
to H. Collins), which means competition law rules, rules on
standardisation etc. Those special rules provide a kind of conflict
of laws when a rule on the legal status of a subject (i.e. a party to
contractual obligation) states differently against a rule on the legal
regime of an object. Three examples from the Russian Supreme
Court’s jurisprudence on privatisation, public procurement, and
consumer protection suggest that the rules on an object should
have a priority. Several theoretical reasons can justify such
a hypothesis: different political purposes of special rules, different
legal nature of special rules, and the fact that the differentiation of
objects is fundamental for the system of contracts in the Russian
Civil Code, making new contractual types.
Keywords:
contractual relationship, legal conflict, system of contracts, competition of rules, contractual type, contract law
Buy a PDF
O.V. Gutnikov, S.A. Sinitsyn The Value and Content of Corporate Statutes at the Present Stage: New Approaches in Terms of Digitalisation The digitisation of the Russian economy has exacerbated the unresolved
problem of statutory regulation of the ratio of legal
provisions, statutes and corporate acts of legal entities, raising
the question of the feasibility of preserving the traditional
documentary registration of constituent documents, by virtue
of the law incorporating the generally binding provisions of corporate
law. Compliance with the established requirements substantially
and without any reasonable expediency burdens both
the business and the state apparatus that implements public
competence in the field of state registration of legal entities,
at the same time dilutes the value of the statute in the system
of corporate acts. Challenges of time require a speedy development
of standard charters of joint-stock companies in Russian
law, the content of which would exclude duplication of legislation,
showing the individuality of the corporate governance
of a particular corporation. The experience of foreign countries
in this matter is informative, but its study does not allow us to
come to the conclusion that foreign developments are uncritically
borrowed by the develo ping Russian corporate law.
Keywords:
model charters, public register of legal entities, corporate acts, local acts, digitalisation
Buy a PDF
K.I. Sklovskiy Overt Conflicts of Interest Between Company and Management Body This article looks at the conflict of laws where a company’s
transactions are challenged by the director who is a shareholder
(participant) in the company. The author concludes
that the director is obliged to reveal certain facts that have
come to his/her knowledge. Otherwise, the challenge the
director files can be construed as a statement of his/her
lack of diligence. Such directors are not empowered to
challenge the transactions they enter into in the capacity
of the company’s management body. In addition, they may
lose all powers when taking a stand against the company as
the business entity will no longer be able to express its will.
Keywords:
void transaction, challenged transaction, interested party transaction, director’s duties, shareholder protection, conflict of interest, corporate conflict, representative’s powers
Buy a PDF
Yu.G. Chelnokov How to Restore the National Business Register’s Reliability with Regard to Information on the Company Executive Body (Using the Example of Limited Liability Companies) This paper is devoted to: 1) the question raised in 2004 by Federal
Tax Service of Russia: “Who, in case of a change of senior management
of a legal entity, should be the applicant when introducing
the said alterations to the legal entity information contained in
the Unified State Register of Legal Entities?”; 2) the answer which
was given to the above question through the decisions of commercial
courts, including the Supreme Arbitrazh Court of the Russian
Federation; 3) the manner in which the reply was made, was understood
and what results or consequences it has lead to; 4) the attempt
to apprehend these consequences; and 5) the search for
ways — if not to put an end to, but to tangibly complicate the vicious
practice of entering into the Unified State Register of Legal
Entities false information about the senior management of Russian
companies (which existed, of course, before the events described
therein, but it was largely simplified exactly as a result of them).
The author’s proposals to change the current legislation are analysed
by him (first of all) in order to find analogies and similar solutions
among the existing corporate law norms in Russia, and (to
a lesser extent) with references to the experience of foreign jurisdictions.
The problem is elucidated using materials relating mainly
to legal entities existing in the legal form of a limited liability company,
which has a separate brief justification in this paper.
Keywords:
false director, false structural unit, Executive Body of Company, LLC, reliability of EGRUL (USRLE), change of senior management in business companies
Buy a PDF
E.V. Shirokova Changing the Statutory Hierarchy of Creditors’ Claims in Bankruptcy: International Practices and Prospects for National Regulation This article is mainly focused on the legal issue of the claims
decrease with respect to the entities controlling the debtor,
and the claims of other creditors within the set priority. Based
on a comparative legal analysis, the subordination and the recharacterisation
are identified. These are features of the statutory
regulation in the national law and foreign law as well
as means of changing claims ranking. The result of the undertaken
study is that the recharacterisation trend for claims
of the entities controlling the debtor, which is emerging in
domestic adjudication, largely contributes to the fair treatment
of bankruptcy matters. At the same time, the law and
order will be able to find a fully fledged solution to the legal
issue of subordination of some claims to others, including
but not limited to the claims which cannot be recharacterised
as corporate ones, only in the course of further integrated
development of bankruptcy law.
Keywords:
bankruptcy, insolvency, subordination of claims of creditors, recharacterisation of claims of creditors, Eigenkapitalersatz, Deep Rock doctrine, Еquitable subordination doctrine, Recharacterisation of debt to equity
Buy a PDF