ARCHIVE FOR 2019 RUSSIAN
// if($this->mag->month > 0 ) { ?>
//=$this->mag->getMonthString();?> //=$this->mag->year;?>
//}?>
// if (!!$this->mag->pdf_file): ?>
// if ($this->sess && $this->sess->isArticlePayed()):?>
//endif?>
//endif;?>
Январь 2019
CONTENT
Chief editor’s column
Interview of the issue
The Event. Comments of the Experts
Topic of the issue
I.S. Shitkina, O.V. Butkova Director Liability Risk and Business Initiative: Searching for Balance The article deals with issues related to the director’s liability
for losses through the prism of entrepreneurial and managerial
risks, which are inseparably connected with the director’s
activities. The authors identify the problems faced by courts
and businesses in the application of legal remedies aimed at
eliminating or limiting director’s property liability. They propose
a number of legal measures that can be implemented in
order to promote business initiative and to protect company
directors from being held liable where their actions are not
aimed at causing damage to the company.
Keywords:
entrepreneurial risk, asset liability, good faith, duty of care, duty of loyalty
Buy a PDF
A.V. Gabov Aspects of Responsibility of Members of the Board of Directors (Supervisory Board) of a Business Entity Acting as a Professional Attorney The issues of responsibility of members of management bodies
of legal entities (especially business entities) are currently in
the focus of attention of both researchers and legislators.
Traditionally, researchers have analysed the civil and criminal
aspects of this responsibility. However, in 2018, the State
Duma of the Russian Federation introduced a bill establishing
administrative responsibility of members of the governing
bodies. The article analyses the proposed novelties, including
from the point of view of regulating the status of those members
of the boards of directors of business entities representing
the state who act as professional attorneys and are supposed
to come under the extended scope of the corresponding
responsibility.
Keywords:
corporation, joint stock company, board of directors, professional attorney, independent director, administrative liability
Buy a PDF
I.V. Stasyuk Vicarious Liability vs Compensation For Harm Caused by Wrongful Act. Choice of Cause of Action This paper weighs up the creditor’s claim against a company
director for damage caused by a wrongful act and the claim
for vicarious liability. The author concludes that the recovery
of company debts from directors can only be under the rules
of vicarious liability. At the same time, recovering damages
caused by a wrongful act helps neither the claimant nor
the respondent or other creditors to adequately protect their
interest in the indebted company.
Keywords:
vicarious liability in bankruptcy, tort liability, liability of debtor’s director, liability of controlling persons
Buy a PDF
S.L. Budylin Fiduciary Duties in Fundamental Transactions: The American Experience This paper provides an overview of Delaware case law concerning
fiduciary duties of directors and majority shareholders
in corporate control transactions and squeeze-outs involving
the compulsory sale of the shares of minority shareholders
in a subsidiary corporation. Unlike Europe, the US experience
shows that the Board’s role is crucial and therefore their fiduciary
duties are relevant, and most of such transactions
undergo judicial review. In squeeze-outs, the majority shareholder
(corporation taking control) also owes fiduciary duty
to minority shareholders. Delaware courts have developed
comprehensive, most nuanced rules to determine whether fiduciaries
have fulfilled their duties in such transactions. There
are three standards of judicial review, including the business
judgment rule (most lenient), enhanced scrutiny (intermediate)
and entire fairness (most stringent one).
Keywords:
fiduciary duties, fundamental transactions, liabilities of directors, squeeze-out, guarantees for minority shareholders’ rights, Delaware corporate law
Buy a PDF
N.L. Lyutov An Interdisciplinary Review of Legal Standards for Executive Staff This article discusses the problematic aspects of conflict
of norms in labour law and civil law as applied to employee
relations. It examines approaches to conflict-of-law provisions
and prevalence of civil law and labour law rules in relation to
the executive staff. The conclusion is reached that there are
mixed managerial contracts combining features from civil law
and labour law.
Keywords:
executive staff, conflict of laws, mixed contracts, non-competition clauses
Buy a PDF
Discussion Board
A.A. Ivanov How to Restructure Consumer Protection This paper aims to identify current developments and future
prospects for consumer protection laws in Russia. While
recognising that central lawmaking tilts the balance towards
manufacturers (producers), the author points to individual
changes that would favour the interests of consumers, primarily
in terms of replacement or service life. The second
section analyses two main trends — personalised manufacturing
and increased burden of recycling — which can impact
the behaviour of consumers and producers in the marketplace
and therefore require legislative instruments to encourage rational
economic decisions. Otherwise, producers will impose
their contractual terms leading to higher levels of consumer
detriment.
Keywords:
consumer protection, paternalism in civil law, product’s service life, warranty period, burden of recycling, product quality
Buy a PDF
A.V. Ilyin The Principle of Justice of Administrative Proceedings The principle of justice of administrative proceedings as
a procedural
principle should have its own specific content.
Without this content, the courts cannot apply this principle
in administrative cases. Comparison of the possible content
of the principle of justice with the principles of legality
and equality and analysis of the possibility of disclosure of
the principle of justice through the characteristics of consideration
(through the active role of the court and the distribution
of the burden of proof) and resolution (identification
with the means of checking the administrative discretion) of
administrative cases show that the principle of justice does
not have its procedural content and does not bear any meaning
that allows to apply it in administrative proceedings.
Keywords:
administrative discretion, principle of justice, active role of court, administrative proceedings
Buy a PDF
Press Release
Theory and practice
A.A. Pavlov Grounds for Interruption of Limitation Periods The limitation period is a classic institution, which is regulated
by fairly conventional precepts of positive law. However,
the interpretation and application of interruption rules can
cause serious difficulties for both modern domestic doctrine
and commercial litigation. This article reflects on the category
of “acts that indicate acknowledgement of debt” and serve as
grounds for interruption of limitation periods. It also reviews
recent case law as related to the respective provisions of Article
203 of the Russian Civil Code.
Keywords:
limitation period, interruption of limitation period, acknowledgment of debt, doctrine of apparent authority
Buy a PDF
K.L. Branovitskiy, V.P. Skobelev Writ Proceedings in Post-Soviet Countries: Lost Opportunity The article provides an overview of the actual procedural
regulation of the EAEU member states in the field of writ proceedings.
The authors analyze the real causa that motivated
the national legislators of some states to exclude the crossborder
nature of the writ, as well as the possible consequences
for the approximation of legal norms in the EAEU
space. The cross-border action of the writ (within an integration
association) can significantly reduce the transaction
costs for citizens and legal entities, increase the availability
of justice for the claimants, and also help reduce caseload in
the courts.
Keywords:
approximation of civil procedure law, writ proceedings, judicial efficiency, fast track
Buy a PDF
D.I. Smolnikov Shifting Burden of Proof in Civil Litigation: Playing Ping Pong or Archery? This article looks at how the burden of proof can be shifted in
civil litigation. Doctrinal approach in Russia upholds a static
model of the burden of proof which stipulates the facts to be
proved by each of the parties. The author finds it to be a misperception
that common law countries have the dynamic
model of shifting the burden of proof (it actually passes from
one party to the other). Moreover, there are serious doubts
about the need to have a conceptual model of the burden of
proof.
Keywords:
evidence, burden of proof, burden of approval, prima facie evidence
Buy a PDF
A.S. Vorozhevich Damages and Other Compensation as a Remedy for Patent Infringements Based on the analysis of Russian and foreign case law,
the author considers the problems associated with protection
of patent rights. The article deals with the problem of
correlation of remedies existing in the Russian law: recovery
of damages,
compensation, and disgorgement of infringer’s
profits. The author substantiates the need for establishing
in Part IV of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation three
methods of calculation of the patent owner’s damages: 1) lost
profits damages; 2) reasonable royalty; and 3) disgorgement
of profits. For each of these methods, a list of circumstances
to be taken into account is defined.
Keywords:
patent infringement, object protected by patent, recovery of damages, compensation, patent law, rightholder
Buy a PDF
A.V. Roslyakov Collective Dominance, Group of Persons, Concerted Practices and Freedom of Contract The institution of collective dominance — in the form in which
it exists in current domestic legislation and law enforcement
practice — restricts competition. Spread of restrictions on
the use of competition tools for entities that formally occupy
a collective dominant position to entities that do not possess
real market power is contrary to the goals of competition
protection legislation. Also, the institution of collective
dominance serves as a tool to facilitate implementation by
the Federal Antimonopoly Service of its functions to the detriment
of the interests of economic entities.
Keywords:
collective dominant position, abuse of dominance, group of persons, concerted practice, freedom of contract, oligopoly
Buy a PDF
A.S. Podmarkova Pre-Emptive Rights in Privatisation: Pro et Contra The article examines the issue of sale of the state-owned (municipal)
share in common real estate ownership and its acquisition
by the other participants of common ownership without
bidding but through the pre-emptive right in compliance with
the legislation on privatisation. Therefore, the author analyses
the statutory regulation of privatisation of a share in common
ownership, and examines the ratio of the norms in civil and
privatisation laws. The pre-emptive right is evaluated and its
category is recognised by privatisation legislation. The author
determines the essence of trading and analyses the requirement
to follow the rules of antitrust and privatisation laws.
The conflicting decisions and arguments from two courts are
reviewed focusing on the necessity of ensuring both public
and private interests of those involved. A summary is provided
for the points of view of public officials and other courts including
the Supreme Court. Finally, the author concludes that
it is necessity to use the pre-emptive right of other participants
in common real estate ownership in the case of acquisition of
a state-owned (municipal) share in it.
Keywords:
privatisation, common ownership, share in real estate ownership, pre-emptive right, methods of privatisation, sale of state-owned property at auction
Buy a PDF