ARCHIVE FOR 2024 RUSSIAN
// if($this->mag->month > 0 ) { ?>
//=$this->mag->getMonthString();?> //=$this->mag->year;?>
//}?>
// if (!!$this->mag->pdf_file): ?>
// if ($this->sess && $this->sess->isArticlePayed()):?>
//endif?>
//endif;?>
Январь 2024
CONTENT
Stanislav Smirnov Forgotten Will Case Comment to the Judgment of the Chamber for Civil Cases of the RF SC No. 78-КГ21-59-К3,
26 September 2023
This article uses a specific case as an example to illustrate the issue of reinstating the deadline for accepting
an inheritance as stipulated in a will. It demonstrates that the criteria previously established in practice for
reinstating the acceptance period of an inheritance under a will may not always be applicable. The author presents
arguments both in favor of and against a special basis for reinstating the acceptance period for heirs named in a
will, specifically focusing on the conscientious unawareness of the will’s existence.
Keywords:
inheritance, will, deadline for accepting inheritance, good faith, escheat
Buy a PDF
FREE TRIBUNE
Anton Ivanov Common Property in a Building (Construction) Commentary on Amendments to Chapter 16 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation
This article analyses the amendments made to the Civil Code of Russia in August 2023. These amendments
primarily focus on the rights to common property in shared areas of a building (construction), including premises
and car parks, owned by different individuals. The regulation of common property in buildings (constructions)
intended for residential and non-residential use is now largely similar. However, the Housing Code of Russia
still prescribes some special rules for residential buildings. A building (construction) with at least two premises
or car parks owned by different individuals transitions from legal to a technical object. The possession, use, and
disposition of common property in such buildings (constructions) can be exercised by the owners of the individual
premises and car parks, in proportion to their respective shares. The rules concerning shared property in buildings
(constructions) are examined in detail.
Keywords:
building (construction), land parcel, territory, common property, shared property, premise, car-parking
Buy a PDF
Vladislav Starzhenetskiy, Anastasia Fomenko Access to Justice in Disputes Affected by Foreign Economic Sanctions The amendments to the Russian Arbitrazh Procedural Code, which expand the exclusive jurisdiction of the Russian
courts over disputes connected with sanctions, have proven to be a popular and highly debated legal remedy. The
authors argue that the purpose of the adoption of article 248.1 of the Russian Arbitrazh Procedural Code is not
limited to resolving procedural deficiencies that the sanctioned persons may face in foreign jurisdictions, but it also
includes the guarantees of fair resolution of a dispute on the merits from the substantive point of view (material
justice). The new jurisdiction of the Russian courts has different nature and is based on different principles than
traditional exclusive court jurisdictions, introducing several important nuances. These include the relative nature of
the jurisdiction of the Russian courts under article 248.1 of the Russian Arbitrazh Procedural Code, the possibility
for interested parties to influence the application of article 248.1 through derogation agreements. These specific
features should also be taken into account in determining the scope of application and limits of the article 248.1
of the Russian Arbitrazh Procedural Code. The authors identify both objective and subjective grounds limiting the jurisdiction of the Russian courts. The influence of international obligations of the Russian Federation, the principle
of close connection, good faith exercise of procedural rights, the level of risk to the right of the sanctioned persons
to justice (especially if disputes are to be considered in friendly jurisdictions) on the application of article 248.1 of
the Russian Arbitrazh Procedural Code by the Russian courts are deliberated in detail.
Keywords:
access to justice, right to court, economic sanctions, overriding mandatory rules, excusive jurisdiction, forum necessitates
Buy a PDF
Daniil Mambetov On Transaction-Like Actions (Part 2) The second part of this article delves into the legal regime of transaction-like actions, specifically focusing on the
rules that govern relationships pertaining to this type of statement. It includes a detailed analysis of the applicable
norms and explores the potential for bridging any gaps by drawing analogies with existing law. Following a
thorough examination of the applicability of most rules governing transactions, the author concludes that despite
the theoretical distinction of transaction-like actions as a separate legal category, there is no significant practical
difference in how transactions and transaction-like actions are regulated.
Keywords:
transaction-like actions, transaction, legal gap, analogy of the law
Buy a PDF
Sergei Domnin The Procedure for Establishing and Reviewing the Remuneration of Insolvency Practitioners in Russia and Abroad This article addresses the process of setting and revising the remuneration for insolvency practitioners in major
foreign jurisdictions and in Russia. It particularly considers recent changes in law enforcement practices as
evidenced by the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation’s 2023 rulings in the cases of Volzhsky Terminal, LLC
and Atkarsky MEZ, JSC. The author examines the new model for calculating percentage-based remuneration as
proposed by the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, highlighting potential challenges and issues that may
arise during its practical implementation.
Keywords:
bankruptcy, insolvency practitioner, remuneration
Buy a PDF
Vyacheslav Grigoriev Legal Impossibility of Fulfilment in Foreign Law and International Codifications The author considers the peculiarities of regulation of the key issues of the institute of legal impossibility of
fulfilment of obligations in European legal systems and supranational codifications. The discussion ranges from
the recognition of this concept’s independence at the national law level to the specific rules of its application and
the implications of distinguishing this legal institute. Based on the results of the analysis, the author concludes that, despite the presence of common features, the concept of legal impossibility of fulfilment of obligations has its
own peculiarities in each legal system. These distinctions could be valuable for the evolution and understanding
of this institution within Russian law.
Keywords:
impossibility of fulfilment, force majeure, fault, legal impediments
Buy a PDF