Magazine content за Декабрь 2016 г.
Magazine Cover
Press to zoom

Buy a PDF

ARCHIVE FOR 2016    RUSSIAN

mag->month > 0 ) { ?>

mag->getMonthString();?> mag->year;?>

mag->pdf_file): ?> sess && $this->sess->isArticlePayed()):?>

Декабрь 2016

CONTENT

 

 

Roman Bevzenko, Igor Yastrzhembskiy Value Slipped Away
Case comment on the judgment of RF SC No. 305-ЭС16-7885, 17 October 2016
Buy a PDF

 

Evgeny Gavrilov Compensation for Unlawful Damage to Business Reputation
Case comment on the judgment of RF SC No. 307-ЭС16-8923, 18 November 2016
Buy a PDF

 

Maria Erokhova Seller Lost a Proprietary Action. Is a Good Faith Purchaser Protected?
Case comment on the judgment of RF SC No. 36-КГ16-8, 2 August 2016
Buy a PDF

 

Anton Ivanov Mandatory State Registration and Villa Communities
Case comment on the ruling of RF CC No. 23-П, 10 November 2016
Buy a PDF

 

 

FREE TRIBUNE

Vasily Makovkin, Elena Bolychevskaya Major Transactions and Interested-Party Transactions: Some Pitfalls of New Regulation
Amendments to the LLC Law and Joint-Stock Companies Law enacted by the Federal Law of 3 July 2016 No. 343-FZ and covering major transactions and interested-party transactions enter into force from 1 January 2017. Rigorous requirements to provide corporate approvals for such transactions have burdened the business for long time: this is one of the key shortfalls of the current regulation raised by the authors of the draft law. The idea behind the reform was to simplify approval rules, and at the same time tighten the rules for challenging transactions made without approval. The analysis of new regulations confirms that sometimes the outcome could be the opposite. What issues should a lawyer pay attention to when the company plans to enter into new transaction? What safeguards does the company need when it establishes new contractual relationship with a trusted or a new partner and is it worth doing? What provisions should be included in the new charters of the companies and how should the rules of the current charters apply? While covering the key aspects of new rules, the authors of the article attempt to assess some of the ambiguous issues which in-house lawyer can face in practice.
Keywords: major transaction, interested-party transaction, consent for the transaction, ordinary course of business, invalidity of the transaction
Buy a PDF

 

Daniil Volodarskiy On the Issue of Overturning the Execution of Judgment if the Claimant Abandons His Suit
The article analyses the consequences of the abandonment of the suit by the claimant. The main result is that the claimant could no longer bring the same suit. Another important consequence, the article argues, is that the claimant cannot deny the overturning of the execution of the judgment using the arguments which formed the basis of his suit. If he could have done so, this would have allowed him to start the dispute afresh despite the fact that he abandoned his claim.
Keywords: overturning the execution of judgment, abandonment of a suit, estoppel by judgment, principle of identity, instuctive function of the judge
Buy a PDF

 

Dmitry Kopylov Quasi-Treasury Shares
This article deals with the analysis of the legal regime of so-called quasi-treasury shares as well as the analysis of the economic-and-legal situation in which shares become quasi-treasury shares. The second part of the article analyses the recommendation to introduce a ban on voting quasitreasury shares provided for by the Road map for improving corporate governance approved by the Government of the Russian Federation. Moreover, the article contains a number of recommendations as to what should be taken into consideration in case of formulating the relevant legal norms on the basis of the recommendation set forth by the Road map.
Keywords: controlling organization, controlled organization, treasury shares, quasi-treasury shares, cross-shareholding
Buy a PDF

 

Evgeny Suvorov On the Legal Nature of the Grounds for the Avoidance of Preferential Transfer of Debtor’s Property and Objections to Such Avoidance
The article deals with challenging debtor’s transactions that lead to the preferential treatment of some creditors as opposed to other creditors. The legal nature of this ground for avoiding transactions is analysed through the principle of creditors’ equality (paritas creditorum) and by means of comparison with transactions that are performed to the detriment of the creditors. The focus is on objections available to the defendant against such claims. The article compares these objections in Russian law with the similar objections in other jurisdictions (USA, UK, France, Spain, Netherlands, Germany). The article demonstrates the current state of Russian law in this respect. The analysis is illustrated by contemporary judgments of the higher courts of Russia. Furthermore, the author discusses main aims of the regulatory policy. The analysis is based on the recent amendments to the bankruptcy legislation.
Keywords: bankruptcy, invalid transactions, preferential transfer, ordinary course of business

 

Francesco Giglio A Systematic Approach to «Unjust» and «Unjustified» Enrichment
Abstract — The law of enrichment addresses situations of misplacing wealth. It is not clear in English law whether the restitutionary claim in enrichment requires an «unjust» or an «unjustified» transfer of wealth. The autor argues that the two adjectives indicate the existence of two claims, which differ in their structures and aims. «Unjust» and «unjustified» misplacements account for two different legal principles. «Unjust» enrichments refer to a concept of fairness in legal transfers which is independent of strictly legal rules. «Unjustified» enrichments trigger a legal responce based on the lack of justification of the transfer. The two actions originate in Roman law. After having presented the origin and function of the claims, the first part of the article outlines their evolution in the German, French, and Italian legal systems. The second part examines whether the Roman law partition can be used to develop a systematic account for English law. Although the framework is still unsettled,it seems that the English law of enrichment may benefit from analysis in the light of a dual structure akin to the one which, in the autor's view, characterizes the civil jurisdictions under examination.
Keywords: unjustified enrichment, unjust enrichment, actio de in rem verso
Buy a PDF