ARCHIVE FOR 2018 RUSSIAN
// if($this->mag->month > 0 ) { ?>
//=$this->mag->getMonthString();?> //=$this->mag->year;?>
//}?>
// if (!!$this->mag->pdf_file): ?>
// if ($this->sess && $this->sess->isArticlePayed()):?>
//endif?>
//endif;?>
Апрель 2018
CONTENT
Kirill Nam The Case of Late Submission of the Demand for the Return of an Overpaid Fee German Federal Supreme Court Judgment VII ZR 177/13 of 23 January 2014 and Case Commentary
This case was brought by the client who demanded the return of an overpaid fee from the contractor
after a considerable lapse of time, challenging the validity of the payment clause in the agreement
with contractor. The submission was dismissed by lower courts invoking the German doctrine of
estoppel. Nevertheless, the German Federal Supreme Court found that it is not enough merely to
mention the party’s earlier contradictory position. In such cases, the unconscionable conduct will be
declared unfair only where later claims may impose a serious detriment on the opposing party.
Keywords:
unfair, abuse of process, estoppel, unacceptable damage
Buy a PDF
FREE TRIBUNE
Vladimir Kilinkarov Current Problems and Trends in Litigation and Dispute Resolution in Public-Private Partnerships in Russia This article describes results of an analysis of 2014–2017 court cases relating to the disputes
involving concession and other PPP projects structured according to either federal or regional laws.
The author considers and analyses the most important conclusions of the courts on the matters of
public procurement for PPP agreements, objects of concession agreements, financing and taxation
of PPP projects, amending and termination of project agreements, deeming agreements to be invalid,
using contract models not covered by the federal legislation, as well as arbitrability of concession
disputes.
Keywords:
public-private partnership, concession, termination of a contract, privatization, arbitrability
Buy a PDF
Rustem Miftakhutdinov Limited Relativity of Court Decisions in Bankruptcy: How Can Bona Fide Creditors Protect Themselves against an Unjustified Claim Approved by a Court Decision This article concentrates on the scope of court decisions made on disputes between debtors and
creditors prior to the bankruptcy process. It discusses protection of the rights of creditors or third
parties in insolvency cases and against invalid claims approved by court decisions in fictitious disputes
they were not involved in. Based on the analysis and comparison of judgments which deal with this
problem (including those of the Russian Supreme Court) the author argues that the domestic law
enforcement solution does not properly protect creditors from debtor abuse. Therefore, the principle
of relativity of court decisions should be given a greater scope in bankruptcy proceedings to balance
the interests of all parties.
Keywords:
insolvency (bankruptcy), creditors’ claims, abuse of right, binding effect of court orders, false claims
Buy a PDF
Yuriy Fogelson Intent in Insurance. Two Negatives Make an Affirmative On the Practice of Applying Clause 9 of Article 24.1 of Bankruptcy Law
This paper considers the practice of applying сlause 9, аrticle 24.1 of the Federal Law «On Insolvency
(Bankruptcy)», which was adopted by the Economic Chamber of the RF Supreme Court in 2017. The
norm in question is analysed and it is shown that because of its insufficient elaboration by the legislator,
the social and economic significance of compulsory liability insurance of bankruptcy administrators
was largely lost. The Economic Chamber managed to restore the socio-economic meaning of the
said relations, though making some mistakes in its interpretation of rules on insurance. This suggests
that the situation in domestic insurance law, in terms of both law-making and law enforcement, is far
from being normal.
Keywords:
insurance, insolvency (bankruptcy), right of recourse intent in insurance, compulsory liability insurance of bankruptcy administrators
Buy a PDF
Anton Ivanov Tax Violations: between Intent and Accident The article is devoted to the analysis of tax liability in terms of general principles of public law. The main
attention is paid to cases when the tax obligation (duty to pay legally established taxes and fees) is
formulated vaguely or contradictorily. In fact, in such cases an extensive interpretation of tax obligations
is applied, which under certain conditions conflicts with the principles of public liability. In order to avoid
these contradictions, tax and investigative bodies in border situations propose to prosecute taxpayers
only in case of intentional violation. The article argues that instead of this approach it is possible and
necessary to talk about the absence of wrongful conduct irrespective of intention. The rationale of this
approach being that without clear prohibition any action should not be considered unlawful. The article
also analyses the overall correlation of intent and negligence in tax law.
Keywords:
tax, tax liability, wrongfulness, intent, negligence, accident
Buy a PDF
Sergey Arakelov, Konstantin Chekmyshev, Vadim Soldatenkov Subsidiary Responsibility as a New Factor in Economic Development This paper looks at recent bankruptcy developments, novelties and improvements in subsidiary
responsibility, and suggests how the latter can be used as part of management strategy. The authors
conclude that this institution helps ensure good faith in the acts of economic agents in the sphere of
business and finance, which ultimately enhances mutual trust between them.
Keywords:
subsidiary responsibility, institution, economic development, bankruptcy, creditor, debtor
Buy a PDF
Sergey Budylin What is Good Faith, or the Case of an Incommodious Cell Based on the Judgment of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation No. № 84-КГ17-6, 14 November 2017
A prisoner was confined six months in a cramped cell that did not meet statutory requirements for
accommodation. He sued the prison authority seeking compensation for psychological damage.
A lower court awarded RUB 4,500 in compensation. But the Civil Division of the Russian Supreme
Court ordered a fresh trial as presumably the prisoner did not suffer any pain in the cramped cell and
filed a bad faith lawsuit. Despite the stated principle of good faith, the Division’s decision appears to
be both unconscientious and clearly unethical. The prisoner’s case shows an unhealthy tendency of
courts to use good faith as a pretext for deciding any disputes in favor of the government.
Keywords:
good faith, Supreme Court, psychological damage, tort
Buy a PDF
Marat Fattakhov Temporal Scope of Federal Law No. 266-ФЗ of 29 July 2017 This paper approaches the issue of the temporal scope of Federal Law No. 266-ФЗ of 29 July 2017
as being applied by commercial courts in selected cases. The Law in question is misapplied as a
result of the unfortunate wording of its art. 4(3). Since this Law has no retroactive effect, courts
should apply its substantive provisions strictly to subsequent circumstances in order to avoid errors
and produce case law that is consistent and coherent.
Keywords:
bankruptcy, secondary liability, temporal scope of the law
Buy a PDF
Alexandra Osipova, Gagik Shagoyan, Konstantin Ibragimov, Maria Kalincheva, Arina Nikulushkina Collusion and Evident Detriment as Grounds for Invalidity of Transaction: An Analysis of Application of Section 2 of Article 174 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation This article summarises over 60 cassation judgments relating to the application of art. 174 (2) of the
Russian Civil Code that stipulates two separate grounds of invalidity of transactions where transactions
are concluded by a representative or legal entity’s body acting without power of attorney to the detriment of
the represented individual or legal entity. The practical consequences of the highest courts' clarifications
are also considered in the context of art. 174 (2) of the Russian Civil Code. The research highlights a
number of pressing problems, including that of distinguishing between the two elements of transaction
invalidity under that clause, the standard of counterparty’s good faith in bargaining that leads to an
evident detriment to the represented person, what counts as evident detriment and other criteria.
Keywords:
invalidity of transactions, to the detriment of represented individual or legal entity, collusion, evident detriment
Buy a PDF