ARCHIVE FOR 2015 RUSSIAN
// if($this->mag->month > 0 ) { ?>
//=$this->mag->getMonthString();?> //=$this->mag->year;?>
//}?>
// if (!!$this->mag->pdf_file): ?>
// if ($this->sess && $this->sess->isArticlePayed()):?>
//endif?>
//endif;?>
Октябрь 2015
CONTENT
Interview of the issue
The Event. Comments of the Experts
Topic of the issue
Y.V. Tay. Changes! We are Longing for Changes... The article provides a brief analysis of certain proposals
for the reform of the Russian arbitration system concerning
the permission for judge emeritus to adjudicate disputes as
an arbitrator, and the issues of arbitrability. The author finds
necessary to establish partnership relations between state
courts and arbitral tribunals resulting in the improvement
of the image of the last ones and lessening the caseload
of the first ones.
Keywords:
arbitration, arbitral tribunal, arbitration proceedings, arbitration reform, arbitrability
Buy a PDF
N.S. Lashkov. Confidentiality of Arbitration Proceedings: the Notion and the Limits There is a long tradition of discussing whether
the confidentiality of arbitration proceedings derives from
the agreement of the parties or from the adjudication
of a dispute by an arbitral tribunal. The author gives
an analysis of grounds and limits of confidentiality in
commercial arbitration.
Keywords:
international commercial arbitration, privacy and confidentiality, searching for the balance between private and public interests, discovery procedure
Buy a PDF
A.V. Grebelsky. Electronic Evidence in International Commercial Arbitration Due to the growth of electronic document circulation in
international trade electronic evidence became of particular
importance in fact-finding in international commercial
arbitration. The parties and arbitrators must take into account
the specificity of electronic information, particularly with
regard to the production and evaluation of such evidence.
Many arbitration institutions and specialised bodies dealing
with arbitration have designed different practical guidelines
to help the participants of the arbitration procedure to
comprehend the essential features of electronic evidence
and explain the order of their submission in the framework
of arbitration procedure. It is necessary to allocate among
these features a capacity of electronic evidence to restore in
most cases even after their removal by the user, as well as
metadata that has its own probative value. The disclosure
of electronic evidence may be accompanied by involving
technical specialists and experts, as well as using special
software in order to avoid the US style discovery and
inadvertent disclosure of documents covered by evidentiary
privileges.
Keywords:
international arbitration, evidence, electronic document production, electronic disclosure, electronic discovery
Buy a PDF
M.А. Akchurina, M. Molfa. Asian Arbitration Centers: Challenge to the Traditional Arbitration Institutions? Due to recent economic and political developments, there
has been an increased interest by the Russian legal and
business community towards Asian arbitration centers
in the last year. The authors consider the key features of
arbitration proceedings conducted under the Rules of the
Hong Kong International Arbitration Center and the Singapore
International Arbitration Center, and compare them with
those conducted under the Rules of Arbitration of the London
Court of International Arbitration and the International Court
of Arbitration of the International Chamber of Commerce. The
purpose of this analysis is to compare the effectiveness of the
procedural devices provided by the HKIAC and SIAC Rules
with those of the LCIA and ICC Rules. Тhe authors also touch
upon certain features that are unique to the HKIAC and SIAC
Rules, and are not reflected in either the LCIA or ICC Rules,
and therefore may not be familiar to Russian arbitration users.
Accordingly, this article constitutes a useful roadmap to the
HKIAC and SIAC Rules for practicing lawyers who have not
yet familiarised themselves with these rules and have not
reviewed them against the LCIA and ICC Rules. This article
also discusses some of the key issues that are likely to arise
in any international arbitration proceedings and will therefore
assist Russian and foreign lawyers who have little experience
in international commercial arbitration.
Keywords:
international commercial arbitration, rules of arbitration, Hong Kong International Arbitration Center, Singapore International Arbitration Center, LCIA, ICC
Buy a PDF
Judicial practice. Comments
GARANT
Press Release
Theory and practice
M.A. Rozhkova. Protocol of Disagreements and Certain Other Problems related to Contract Conclusion: are there any Decisions Suggested in the Current Civil Code? The article is focused on the issues of contract conclusion,
particularly those concerning the protocol of disagreements.
The author strives to dispel the deeply-rooted “soviet” myths
preserved in the national practice of contract conclusion and
suggests the decision for long-pending problems through
the analysis of the provisions of Chapter 28 of the Civil Code
of the Russian Federation and of their practical application.
The article seems to draw rather optimistic conclusions
regardless of the imperfections of national legislation in the
named area: the author believes that the detected difficulties
of “legal understanding” could be overcome quite easily.
Keywords:
conclcusion of a contract, protocol of disagreements, essential terms of a contract
Buy a PDF
V.G. Borodkin. Shareholders’ Agreement as a Mechanism for Breaking a Deadlock in a Company A conflict between the participants of a company can lead
to a deadlock, a situation in which the conflict has no
effective solutions. The article gives an analysis of ways
to break the deadlock which are provided by the current
Russian legislation and might be foreseen in a shareholders’
agreement. The author pays special attention to the following
mechanisms: exclusion from a company, liquidation of a
legal entity and call (put) option on shares.
Keywords:
shareholders’ agreement, deadlock, corporate conflict
Buy a PDF
D.V. Kachkin, R.R. Repin. Public-Private Partnership Agreement as a Civil Law Contract In July 2015 the State Duma passed the Federal Law dated
13 July 2015 No. 224-FZ “On Public-Private Partnership,
Municipal-Private Partnership in the Russian Federation and
the Amendments to Certain Legislative Acts of the Russian
Federation”. The idea of introducing federal legislation
regulating the relations arose from the PPP Agreement
should be supported, but the lawmaking product presented
to the Russian society can not be assessed explicitly. The
authors attempt to analyse the specific regulations of the
law and provide a corresponding general description of the
new federal act.
Keywords:
public-private partnership, public-private partnership contract, investments, infrastructure, concession, concession contract
Buy a PDF