ARCHIVE FOR 2013 RUSSIAN
// if($this->mag->month > 0 ) { ?>
//=$this->mag->getMonthString();?> //=$this->mag->year;?>
//}?>
// if (!!$this->mag->pdf_file): ?>
// if ($this->sess && $this->sess->isArticlePayed()):?>
//endif?>
//endif;?>
Октябрь 2013
CONTENT
IN THE SCIENTIFIC ADVISORY BOARD
AT THE FEDERAL ARBITRATION COURT OF THE URAL DISTRICT
COURT PRACTICE. COMMENTS
VIEW OF THE PROBLEM
S.N. Volkov Certain Aspects of Complicity in Monopolistic Activities and Unfair Competition Administrative prosecution of persons who do not fall within a special subject of competition legislation violations, as well as of persons who are, in accordance with competition law, members of a group of persons including a person who directly committed the violation presents difficulties in practice. The author puts forward solutions to the problematic issue.
Keywords:
complicity, involvement, qualifying characteristics, group of persons, competition-restricting agreements (concerted actions), coordination, economic concentration, accountability, agency agreement
Buy a PDF
Yu. B. Gongalo Termination of Interim Measures in Civil and Arbitration Proceedings The article deals with the topical issues related to determination of the moment of termination of interim measures in accordance with the civil and arbitration procedural legislation. Based on the analysis of the practice of courts of general jurisdiction and commercial courts, the author identifies drawbacks of the existing approach to abolition of interim measures and advances amendments to the procedural law aimed at resolution of problems outlined in the article.
Keywords:
abolition of interim measures, entry into force, amendments to the procedural law, dismissal of a claim
Buy a PDF
DISCUSSION TRIBUNE